|
Future
Shoes: "Down with
Freedom!" In
the early 1970s I enjoyed a couple of pictures made by Spanish filmmaker Luis
Bunuel: "The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie" and "The Phantom
of Liberty." Bunuel had a ball making these weird, Goyaesque comedies
lampooning middle class ways. In
one scene he reversed the sense of what is shameful, showing a soire in which
the living room is full of toilets and people sit around chatting and defecating
-- and then sneaking off individually to an antiseptic little room in which to
gobble down some furtive morsels of food. In
another scene, perhaps from the French Revolution, a man led before a firing
squad is asked if he has any last words. He pumps his fist angrily in the air
and exclaims, "Down with freedom!"
I nearly choked from laughing, and a handful of others in the theater
did, too. Because
while the sentiment is constitutionally unacceptable, it is desperately, deeply
true. Freedom -- the prerogative to choose, and the concomitant notion that one
choice is as valid as they next -- is the milk we suck as citizens. It means
everything to us, on both the right and the left. But it is plainly our
downfall. I
did not understand this until my dog turned five. Dogs are like laboratory
universes in which you can test all sorts of propositions. Since they don’t
live long, and they are behaviorally transparent, you can watch them their whole
lives and understand the mistakes. My
poodle Beauregard dog was raised off-leash, Rousseau-style. He is a beautiful,
comical creature when he runs, and it was tedious to have his bulk and his
rhythms tethered to mine. So, despite numerous municipal ordinances and common
sense, I let him roam. Instead
of a noble savage, he just grew into a savage. Though I plead and cajole, he is
hopelessly dominant, humiliating other male dogs at will. While I love him to death, he
is the thing I think I despise most in the world, a bully. And it's my fault,
because I romanticized his freedom. I ruined my kids the same way. Treated them like short adults from an early age. Let them watch King Kong (the original) as tots. I tried not to dictate terms or make decisions for them. Encouraged them to think, judge, express, indulge. They grew up too fast, and often out of kilter. I love 'em, and they’re good people, and I have confidence in them. But
a huge part of the truly essential parenting they will need in their lives --
discipline -- they are going to have to provide themselves, probably in their
30s, long after all their peers have learned how to dust-mop. The freedom I gave
them has in many stunted, not fostered, their growth as people. Ruined
myself the same way, but that's an ongoing story. Another
insight I had in the 70s, besides Bunuel, was with my yoga teacher, Dr. Arya. He
taught me -- well, he told me, because I never quite internalized it -- that
repression results in more good things than expression. This was a hard truth
because I am a hopeless expressive: I seldom know my own opinion on a topic
until I blurt it out. Believe me, I am usually as aghast as the rest of you. But
this truth was self-evident: people who restrain their impulses get control over
their lives, and eventually, something like control over the confusion around
them. Whereas, I meditated pretty much to get high. Forget
me. Look at America. Big picture. We think we're wonderful, open-hearted,
straight-talking people. Our identity fixes on our generosity: in our minds we
are always offering candy bars to war refugees and drilling wells for shoeless
tribespeople. While
the whole world envies our freedoms, however, no one especially likes what we do
with them. The "ugly" in "ugly Americans" derives exactly
from this sense of thoughtless entitlement. We're pigs, basically. Nearly
every American act pivots on the primacy of choice, and our delight at being to
do whatever we want. As Ivan, the liberal of the four Karamazov brothers, put
it, "Everything is licit." I
tried making a list of ways in which our pursuit of freedom has screwed us up.
It's an impossible list, ranging from guns to pornography to atmospheric CO2
levels to television to predatory capitalism to school killings to the strategic
defense initiative ... I'm telling you, it's a long, awful list . Think
how our sense of what is licit has corrupted the world:
Having
given the rich and powerful the mega freedom to run the world, ply us with
advertising, manipulate our prejudices and commandeer our time, we reserve for
ourselves the pleasuring freedoms of eight-acre lots, SUVs and jet skiing.
In the free world there is no shame, and public defecation -- flight attendants
know what I'm talking about -- is becoming more acceptable. We
know freedom makes us miserable, but we can’t quit. Knowing every door is
technically open to us makes it all the more heartbreaking and unacceptable when
we are unable to open them in practice. How many stalkings and killings occur
because "entitled" people didn’t get what they wanted? The
man who cried "Down with freedom" in the movie was onto something. But
our very freedom prevents us from curtailing it. It robs us of leverage to discriminate
(a very bad word which used to be a very good word). How does one get a grip?
Should we start right off with global warming? Myself
personally, I bought the dog a leash. And the funny thing is, he tolerates it
reasonably well.
Like the essay? Click
on the picture and buy a memento |
mfinley.comCOPYRIGHT (c) 2001by MICHAEL FINLEY Comments on the site(especially interested in opinions on PayPal, the Amazon tip jar, and Microsoft Reader e-books.)
reader feedbackHi, Michael. You know, there was something quite powerful about this column. It seems not so much to be about freedom, as about sort of entitlement as falsifying freedom. It reminds me of a poem by George Herbert, "The Collar," that I almost got into a fistfight with at graduate school but have come to surrender to and respect now as I age.I typed the successive MS drafts of a four-volume HISTORY OF LIBERY IN AMERICA by Oscar and Lilian Handlin. At some point it came to my attention that people like Thomas Jefferson (all men created equal and endowed, etc) and Patrick Henry (Give me Liberty or give me death!), were slaveholders. This was the missing detail in the mystery of why these Americans were so obsessed with liberty: they were sitting on not only women but men when the men were "black." The whole thing has a rather fishy quality that is intensely intresting. I hope we go on to "Down with Freedom II" at some point. Freedom, if we mean it in any real sense, seems arduous, but I think people CRAVE it. Today so many institutions misrepresent it and dislike it that it isn't easy even to HEAR of it or CONCEIVE it. It's getting to MEAN something like unchallenged oafishness or whatever, one of its opposites. Well, anyway, thanks. Kathleen
Winner, Financial Times/Booz Allen & Hamilton
Global Business Book Award, Best Management Book - The Americas, 1995
Table of contents and sample chapters of this book...
Just click on the book cover to order your signed copy for only $12.95.
Table of contents and sample chapters of this book...
I enjoyed serving this essay up for you, and I did it for free. But I am a few clients lighter right now than I need to be, and a bit of revenue never hurts. If you'd like to contribute to this site, consider dropping a $1 tip in the "Honor Box" here. Think of it as a voluntary subscription. Just click the CLICK TO PAY image here. Thanks! - Mike Total tips, year
to date: $203.00 - MANY THANKS!
Visit Amazon.com
|