Date of publication: April 24, 2000
|
mfinley.comCOPYRIGHT (c) 2000by MICHAEL FINLEY
Stimulate the economy, give a poet a dollar.I enjoyed serving this essay up for you, and I did it for free. But this writer is currently out of work, and a bit of revenue would gladden his heart. If you'd like to contribute to this site, consider dropping a $1 tip in the "Honor Box" here. Just click the CLICK TO PAY image here. Thanks - Mike
Why not bookmark Mike's columns for your weekly enjoyment?Comments on this column:I enjoyed your column, with one exception. You dishonor conservatives like WIlliam Buckley when you include Rush Limbaugh and Congressman Dan Burton in their ranks. Limbaugh, Burton and their cohort are reactionaires. Keep up the good work.Walter F. Wouk I am amazed that you are more interested in Matt Drudges work than you are of a govt. that in the cover of darkness invades a citizens home takes a person and places them away from his lawyers, the media and every outsider except the lawyer for President Clinton and Castro. I am sure in a few days Elain will say whatever it is they want him to say. Shades of communist Russia. F. T. Nolan Reply: My point about Drudge was that he deliberately misled people by cropping that photograph -- which is the epitome of maladorous journalism. Either that, ort he was just plain wrong -- I don't hear the Miami relatives claiming any more that the photo of Elian and his father is fake. Time was (very recently!) when Republicans believed in family above politics. So I agree with you that the GOP seems to be teetering on the brink of totalitarianism these days, disrupting families for political motives. But what can freedom and family-loving citizens like ourselves do? I agree that Drudge has the right under our Constitution to mislead -- but you and I have the right to call him on it when he does! I would love to hear your thoughts. -Mike Amazing stuff about Drudge. Aristotle said that the greatest danger to a democracy was posed by demagogues. But I think it's also important to set the events of the past six months within the context of the relationship not just between Cuba and the US government but also between the US government and the Cuban-Americans in this country. In a nutshell--for 40 years now, we have tolerated outright lawlessness on the part of a small faction of this group as well as the vocal endorsement of that lawlessness on the part of nearly the whole group. Among other things, the US has sometimes turned a blind eye toward the activities of paramilitary groups in Florida--which have occasionally been guilty of terrorism--bombing civilian flights, etc--and sometimes actively enlisted the help of those groups for own own extralegal foreign adventures, as in the use of Cuban-American mercaneries to train the Contras. I'm not saying Cuba si, Yanquis no, here. The US is not Castro's Cuba. But "All Elian, All The Time" was more than an instance of media frenzy and/or political pandering. It was also the chickens coming home to roost. The "Miami relatives" clearly thought they could get away with defying the law. Given what they either knew or absorbed by way of osmosis in the hot-house of Miami, they had no reason to think they wouldn't succeed. R.B. I, too, miss the real conservatives. These bastard offspring of the conservative movement have co-opted the worst of liberal excesses -- the entitlement mentality and the victimhood mentality. P. H. in america, sir. we dont keep the names of our police secret. M. For some time now, I've avoided Mssrs Drudge and Limbaugh because they just made me too mad. Recently, though, I was watching a program called (I think) "Hannity and Colmes." Have you seen it? It's on the Fox News Network and is similar to CNN's "Crossfire". They were interviewing a woman who spent about two years camped in a tree. It seems a lumber company was proposing to take down a group of very old redwoods; she succeeded in saving them after taking up residence in the branches of the most venerable one and refusing to come down. Mr. Hannity, the program's "conservative" commentator, persisted in calling her a "tree hugger" and trying to suggest that she was against cutting down any trees, ever; she patiently tried to explain that there's such a thing as careful, responsible logging. Then Mr. Hannity said, "Well I'm a conservative; I believe in cutting trees!" That's when it hit me -- the question, "what can the word 'conservative' possibly mean if it's used to signify a philosophy like: "You see a thousand-year-old redwood, you should cut it down, no questions asked." Seemed absurd to me. And yes, the Elian case has shown us a strange breed of "conservatives" who speak out against "the rule of law" and articulate a bizarrely extreme version of children's rights (that a six-year old should get to decide for himself what country he's going to live in, &c.). MKE I'm with you - I'm tired of this whole Gonzales bs. It's a straight up parential rights case for me. The US government (or any government) shouldn't get involved in these kinds of family matters. As long as the child isn't abused the politicians and bureacrats should butt out. Same goes for N.Korea, Chile, Iraq, doesn't matter. Parents have the right to raise their kid how and where they want to. Now this might make me a CONSERVATIVE (choke..choke.. gasp..painful cry... sound of body dropping to the floor...). Your definitition has been out of fashion for quite a long time. The current definition is more akin to distrust/hatred of the government than rule by law (note John Birch Society, right wing militias, Richard Nixon, the CIA from the 50's to the present, the anti-abortion movement - it goes on and on). Conservatives know that in an ideological struggle law is of no consequence at worst and an annoyance at best. US and Cuba? If N. and S. Korea can sit down -why not? There no up side for the US except maybe being morally right for a change.. but what the hay... A.V. I second that! When I was a student at Bard College, CrossFire was filmed at the Levy Institute and Buckley (a friend of the president of the college, Leon Botstein) came a number of times to be on the show or to give a speech. When he did, he debated in the classic spirit between conservatives and liberals or spoke eloquently about a compelling aspect of politics (he probably received elocution lessons from his brother). To understand the words between the statements took a great deal of background knowledge. Those not well versed in American and contemporary history would not understand or get the wry humor in it all. What was really great about it all was that, if you didn't understand something, a group of students would sit around debating about what was debated.... makes me miss school and Buckley. K.L. "Lots of us find it a very helpful, human, sometimes humorous, always interesting, often surprising column that has no peer on the freelance market, And, yes, you can use that as a testimonial if it helps." -- Bill Dowd, Albany Times Union "No one talks about the ups and downs of technology like Michael Finley. See his columns online at www.mfinley.com/. -- James S. Derk, Evansville (IN) Courier "Editors want everything to fall into a neat little box, and your stuff doesn't do that. You don't write merely about technology, you write about what technology means to us and how it has changed us. I like it." -- John Boxmeyer, St. Paul
America's Best-Loved Futurist(TM), Michael Finley has a free gift for visitors to http://mfinley.com.
Total tips, year
to date: $203.00 - MANY THANKS!
Visit Amazon.com
|