Chapter 22
The Myth of Personality Type
We can encapsulate this chapter
by saying that everything we just said about adventure learning and
teambuilding also holds true for the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory.
Adventure learning used
mountaineering and other outdoor experiences to provide team members with new
understandings about themselves. The Myers-Briggs personality categories also
provide every team member with exhilarating new insights into themselves, and a
set of initials (e.g., ENTP, ISTJ) that explain what kind of person they are.
The Myers-Briggs instrument is more than a piece of paper to enthusiasts -- it
becomes the organizing principle of their lives.
Typology is based on the insight
that there are many "archetypes" of people, that those types can be
tested and defined, and that knowing what type we are relates directly to such
down-to-earth business problems as leadership development, career decisions,
and just plain getting along with others.
Founded on the insights of
pioneer psychoanalyst C.G. Jung, typology holds that people can be divided into
two perceiving or input groups (sensors and intuitors) and two judging or
processing/output groups (thinkers and feelers). It measures the state of your
current nature/nurture stew. Knowing where one falls on the continuum between
the extremes can help you in making career moves, in delegating tasks which are
beyond you, in hiring and assigning people, and in working to strengthen your
lesser talents.
|
I/E
Introvert/Extrovert
|
S/N
Sensing/Intuition
|
|
T/F
Thinking/Feeling
|
P/J
Perceiving/Judging
|
People are different, Jung says,
in the different ways they encounter the world. Broadly speaking, we either
intuit or sense as we perceive and learn about the world. Intuitive types grasp
the truth of a situation in a flash. They are the mysterious beings who never
took notes in class, who guess for success...futuristic and imaginative.
Sensing types, conversely, grope toward understanding in a step-by-step
concrete way ... here and now.
In addition to these two
perception categories, we are also either one of two deciding categories. Quick
judges of a situation are called feelers -- emotion is their strong suit. Slow
judgers are called thinkers -- their strong suits are logic and method.
Overlaying these personality
traits are the categories of Introverts and Extroverts. Where you are on this
continuum leads to assumptions about which of the characteristics above one is
prone to reveal to others.
The kind of perception you
naturally prefer, either sensing or intuition, tends to team up with the kind
of judgement you naturally prefer, whether thinking or feeling. The total
result is a set of sixteen separate personality types combining the strengths
of the eight possible Myers-Briggs categories.
All of us, according to the
theory, have two strong sides and two recessive sides. In fact, type psychology
breaks us down into dozens of additional characteristic, with lots of hyphens
and brackets, superior characteristics and phantom or inferior ones -- striving
desperately to make us stereotypes even in our complexity.
Why do we include Typology among
our team myths? Because, just like adventure learning, typology has virtually
nothing to do with teams.
It is not that personalities are
unimportant. In our chapter on behavior differences, we stated that
personalities are very different -- and when they clash on the job, in the
team, it's bad news.
But the Myers-Briggs Type
Inventory does not measure anything that matters to teams. Teams do not rise or
fall on how people are (either real or perceived) deep down inside. They rise
or fall on what they actually do, how they actually behave toward one another
on the outside.
Behavior, si; typology, no.
The false assumptions the
Myers-Briggs makes is that personality reliably and consistently reveals itself
in outside behaviors. It just ain't so. There are too many confounding life
experiences which modify what we are into how we behave. Also, there is a large
portion of our population that deludes themselves in terms of how they are
viewed by others. They say to themselves, "Oh, I'm an introvert!"
Maybe they drive through the neighborhood, shouting "I'm an
introvert!" into a bullhorn. But they're wrong (introverts don't do that).
All teams care about is what you
do, in real terms, as seen through the eyes of other teammates. What you are
inside is your business.
A wise man once said it this way:
If one person calls you a horse's ass, well, it's just one person. If two
people call you a horse's ass, well, there may be a conspiracy to label you a
horse's ass. But if three people call you a horse's ass, you'd better invest in
a saddle.
You can better determine what
kind of a horse you are by getting behavioral feedback from team members than
by filling out the MBTI questionnaire.
Tip: if you're really hell-bent on going the internally-oriented
(how you see yourself) Myers-Briggs route, don't use it in isolation. Combine
it with it in combination with an
externally-oriented (what you look like to others) inventory, like the Social
Style Inventory, from TRACOM of Denver) or the Personal Profile (DiSC, from
Carlson learning in Minneapolis). It's fascinating how our own image of
ourselves can vary from the way others see us – and very relevant to team
communication.