"A masterpiece of explanatory journalism!" - New Orleans Picayune "Fast, funny, and highly stimulating!" -Business Book Review Get your signed copy of The NEW Why Teams Don't Work by Mike & Harvey Robbins from Berrett-Koehler Publishers Just click on the book cover!

Chapter 23
Myths of Team Leadership

Leadership is the vessel for many of the worst team myths, for a logical reason -- as the keepers of the team vision, leaders make up a lot of stuff. Here are some of the worst illusions foisted by and about leadership.

ƒ      Teams require a single individual to lead them. It isn't so. There are many models of team leadership, ranging from traditional iron-hand rule through various degrees of self-direction to apparent leaderlessness. Leadership can rotate by the clock, by the task at hand.

ƒ      Strong leadership ensures success. It just isn't so. Strong leadership is useless if the people following the leader are incompetent or uninterested in the team task. A fundamentally bad team cannot be "led" -- except perhaps to a place of execution.

ƒ      How a leader is selected is not important. Wrong. Leaders must be selected in a way that is consonant with the task a team is assigned, and the kind of team he or she is assigned to. A free-wheeling, autonomous team will not welcome a leader assigned from outside the group. A new leader may have trouble adjusting to an established team. A team never previously allowed to make decisions for itself may be unable to choose its own leaders.

ƒ      Team success is all that matters. In a narrow sense, sure, team success matters to the team. But team success, whether driven by a strong leader or not, is meaningless if the task was wrong or duplicative or wasteful or pointless.

ƒ      Team structure is a secondary consideration. It isn't. Every team structure and configuration we are aware of -- functionally aligned, cross-functionally aligned, matrix, network, single-leader, multiple-leader, leader-less -- is valid, when applied to the appropriate team task. Perfect leadership and perfect followership combined will still come to nothing unless the team is the right type of team for the task at hand.

ƒ      A good leader and a good team can solve any task. Sorry -- not every task is appropriate for team action. If a task shouldn't be done by a team at all, it hardly matters who or how skilled its leader is. It's easy to get carried away with team fervor, but it's like the old saying, "When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail."

The Myth of Senior Teams

Finally, there is the seriously mistaken notion that senior teams function like other teams, just in a more senior way. That teams at the top – teams comprised of board members, CEOs, presidents, vice presidents and other senior level execs -- roll up their sleeves and collaborate in the same way that grunt teams do. They don't.

Anyone who has been on a senior team knows how rare true camaraderie is. The senior team table more closely resembles a play from the renaissance, with dukes and earls and grand viziers jockeying for advantage, than the kind of team we have been talking about. At the top levels, politics reigns supreme, and "team members" are there less to cooperate on joint action than to pursue constituent agendas.

This is partly because of the personality type that tends to rise to the top of organizations – Drivers with a bullet. Hard charging executives prefer disposing to proposing, and they are typically rewarded for superior top-down, command and control performance. Except perhaps for the Vatican, large organizations to not turn to pastoral types for leadership.

But let's imagine that a generation of powerful collaborative-minded managers rose suddenly to the top – people who share information, swap skillsets, set their egos aside to achieve common objectives. (In fact this will happen someday, and not far in the future. Generation Xers are much more prone to team action than their baby Boomer predecessors.)

The problem is, today's corporations will not welcome this generation, and will throw up powerful resistance to them. Today's organizations are modeled after patriarchal organizations established centuries ago, when leadership was envisioned in a singular, Driver-driven, masculine, competitive, Machiavellian way. Intrigue and manipulation are built into the charters of these organizations. To expect companies like IBM or Chrysler-Daimler or Harvard University to lead the way in describing a new kind of leadership by team, is to ask these organizations to go against their own constitutions.

Senior teams are "teams" in name only. They don't act like real teams because they are really parallel teams of one, each with their own constituents. Real teams share roles and responsibilities. Senior teams typically have parallel accountabilities. They never are able to prioritize goals since each member feels that his niche's goals are the most deserving.

Oh, it is sad and hypocritical. While top management encourages teamwork among the rank and file, they have no clue about it themselves. They can't. They are constitutionally prohibited from engaging in it. When top management cannot practice what it preaches, why should the rest of us take the preaching seriously?

Never, ever, look to top management for team leadership.

(Well, perhaps never is too strong. We will with the passage of time see the development of true senior teams. But it will happen in smaller, younger organizations. And it will be lifetimes before the model in their Fortune 500 counterparts takes hold.)

 

NOW AVAILABLE from from Berrett-Koehler Publishers (San Francisco) and Texere (UK)!

The New WHY TEAMS DON'T WORK
What Goes Wrong and How to Make It Right

"The American business approach to workplace teams is filled with powerful subtleties and is also quite different from the Japanese. The phrase, "How come all this quality stuff don't work," nicely sums up the challenge making teams work in America. Authors Robbins and Finley present practical solutions to the problems with and misconceptions about teams that will be valuable to any organization inclined to assign teams to work on legitimate operational issues. Pragmatic team tips covered here include team decision-making, communication skills with teams, reward and recognition ideas, the importance of effective team leadership, and the fundamental factor of organizational culture that could help or hinder team success. The authors swap narration of chapters, enlivening this useful handbook on how to make the commitment to teams a success. Serves well any manager's interest in maximizing productivity and quality improvement with teams. Recommended for all quality professionals." -- Quality World