Epilog:
Toward Team Intelligence
We began by pledging this wasn't
going to be another team happy-talk book. Hope we didn’t come across as too
negative, though. We believe in teams. But teams are trouble, because they're
made of people, and people are trouble.
The happy-talk books pretended
that just murmuring the mantra of teams would cause all the creepy
organizational goblins -- inefficiency, low productivity, befuddled processes,
high cost, bloated workforce, poor morale, poor return on investment -- to fall
away.
Teams would magically outperform
the old hierarchical system, and everybody would get along, and you wouldn't
need the metal detector at shareholders meetings. Quality without tears.
But hey, guess what -- ain't no
such thing as quality, or any kind of organizational transformation, without
tears. In fact, tears -- meaning, sincerity, commitment, and caring about the
people you work with -- are probably the best sign you'll get that you're on
the right track.
We talked for so many years about
"the bottom line," meaning quarterly profits, that we have trouble admitting
that there are multiple bottom lines to what we do. Besides lying awake at
night worrying about return on outlays, team leaders worry about:
ƒ whether
leadership is leading;
ƒ whether
the team "gets" the organizational vision, or its own goals;
ƒ whether
the full knowledge and intelligence of every team member is being tapped;
ƒ whether
the people who make up the team are getting their non-team needs met.
These are not concerns that
business schools teach. And yet, in the brave new world of teams that is materializing
around us, they are the concerns that will keep the heart of the modern
organization pumping blood.
Team members don't have to be
best friends to be a good team. Every team has people who would not pick one
another to affiliate with in a thousand millenniums.
But we're not lovers, or even
best friends -- we're a team. All we have to do is take one another's side on
the main issues – doing the job the team exists to do.
Philosopher Terry Warner talks
about a "principle of agency," by which all team members become
agents for one another, charged with the task of making one another's dreams
come true.
A better analogy than friends is
family. Like members of a family, team members do not generally ask to be
thrown together. Like families, all teams are flawed. Like families, teams have
their high points and their low points. Fights break out. Emotions flare.
And just as families usually pool
together in crisis, and set their misgivings aside, so must teams. After all,
we spend as much or more time with team members as we do with our real
families. And, the dreams of our real families often are so bound up in the
aspirations of the teams we belong to.
In the best teams you see a
circle -- of sympathy, support, and a limited kind of love. It is the love
engendered when team members sincerely want the best for one another.
In good teams, you see at the
very least an ongoing curiosity about one another. How can we be so different
and still work together? How do we harness the power of our differentness? What
must we do to continue to share information and create new knowledge?
Curiosity, the key to our our intelligence, is the key to team intelligence.
If the team movement arose from
any single ethic it was that people are not cogs and levers, as the old organizational
diagrams suggested. We are human beings. Ignore the interior workings, the
strivings and desires, and team failure is inevitable.
But when people take the time to
learn about one another, what is in their hearts as well as in their minds, we
rise to a higher level.
Call it love, call it curiosity,
call it team intelligence, or don't call it anything at all.
But somehow or other, you have to
get there. It is the glory of working together, and getting things right.