Meg WheatleyUnderstanding Leadership |
||
|
© 2003 by Michael Finley |
||
|
Want to make a hit at your next board meeting? Announce a major change initiative with the words: "Let's take this organization down the path of total chaos." And say it like you mean it. Your colleagues will spew coffee
across the table at the words. People who have known you for years and
have every reason to trust you for your experience and usually sage
counsel will bolt from their chairs and demand your resignation. Everyone present will shake their heads, close their eyes, and
picture an orderly organization pushed off the cliff of all that is
reasonable, plummeting, all hands screaming, down, down into the abyss of
the unknown. It's the word. Chaos has historically been everything any
sensible manager would do anything to avoid. In terms of kneejerk
negativity, it is right up there with bolshevism, kryptonite, and Barney
the dinosaur. So -- why is organizational theorist Meg Wheatley suggesting we
inoculate our organizations with a healthy dose of chaos? Wheatley believes that we way we have been thinking about
organizations (indeed, about everything) for the last three hundred years
is simply wrong. The modern view of the world, which was formed in the
17th century by such scientific worthies as Newton, Kepler, and Galileo,
is predicated upon the geometric symmetries of the ancient Greeks -- pure
circles, perfect squares, and absolutely straight lines. The problem with this "scientific" view of the world
is that it is not an empirical, observable one. Pure circles, pure
squares, or straight lines work elegantly in the abstract realm of
mathematics, but in the real universe they are conspicuous by their
absence.
To read the rest of this report, click on CLICK TO PAY ...
Twentieth-centu |
Margaret Wheatley |
|